|
I think many people may have felt as I did; relief like a burden
being removed when the election was over, regardless of whom
they supported.
Politics has always attracted the sorts of people for whom power
over the lives of others is the ultimate high. The more I
observe, the more I see that Nietzsche's characterization of the
basic human drive, the Will to Power, seems to permeate
everything in our culture. Whether it be business, or sports, or
relationships, or any manner of human endeavor, winning is more
and more the only thing. Ethics have become passé in these times
- "victory at any cost", "whatever it takes", and similar battle
cries are all the rage. It sometimes feels like the high-minded
ideals of the eighteenth century, the Enlightenment, the
philosophical underpinnings that spawned modern Republics, are
in retreat.
It wasn't too much of a shock when I read of a young man from
Georgia, just 25 years old, who was so distraught over the
outcome of the election that he
committed suicide on the World Trade Center site in NYC. Is
the future really that bleak? He thought so.
While many on the losing side were wringing their hands in
despair, former president Bill Clinton had
sage advice for the losers, which comes down to: "Don't
whine; work on your image." Clinton understood politics well
enough to win two terms in spite of powerful and determined
opponents, so he knows what he's talking about.
As the rhetoric of the campaigns assailed us from every angle,
for those not hiding in caves somewhere, I kept thinking of the
Mike Myers character, Dr. Evil, when I would see another
brilliant tactical maneuver by Karl Rove, designed to spin the
news and public attention away from an unfavorable issue for his
side. Although I deplore his methods, the man is clearly in a
league of his own.
A friend sent me a link to an excellent article in which these
modern tactics of politics are clearly explained. It is entitled
Frame Wars, from the Texas Observer. Read if you wish. The
discussion in the article concerns the way successful political
groups work to build mental images in the unsuspecting
population. The author points out that Truth is unimportant in
this battle for minds, an unfortunate circumstance for those of
us naive enough to still hope that "the Truth will set us
free."
The article goes on to articulate the competing worldviews of
those who consider themselves "conservatives" or "liberals" as
follows:
This is about as good a description as I've seen. It is
explanatory without being condescending of either view, a rare
thing. Apparently, most people tend to fall into one of these
groups or the other, lock stock and barrel. Those like myself
who can be conservative on one issue and liberal on another seem
to be a bit more uncommon.
As I see the news on the war in Iraq every day, those competing
worldviews are driven home. The hawkish course we are on is no
different than every other empire builder has embarked upon.
Historians universally speak glowingly of conquerors past, who
forced other peoples into their way of life, at least
temporarily. The way to becoming revered in posterity is
abundantly clear.
For those of us who cling to the naive hope that humans can
someday learn to live side by side without conflict, it seems we
can never achieve more than a brief glimpse of Shangri-La. No,
we have examples like Tibet to demonstrate that even a remote
and isolated people cannot exist indefinitely in a totally
peaceful state. The barbarian hordes will eventually come and
ruin things.
Alas, you can run but you can't hide.
* * * * * * * *
|